1. Giuberti RSO, Caixeta A, Carvalho AC, Soares MM, Abreu-Silva EO, Medina Pestana JO, Silva Junior, HT, Lucia Vaz M, Genereuw P, Fernandes RWA. A randomized trial comparing dual axis rotational versus conventional coronary angiography in a population with a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Oct;27(5):456-64. Doi: 10.1111/joic.12148. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
2. Grech M, Debono J, Xuereb RG, et al. A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80(4): 576–580. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 22105940
3. Klein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SYJ, Hansgen A, Carroll JD. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Cath Cardiovas Interv. 2011;77:820-827.